Last week's report on the probe into the Benghazi Massacre provided little new information and added to the cloud of suspicion over the events that took place during and immediately after the attack. The leaders of the State Department probe acknowledged to Congress that their mission was limited in scope and faced questions as to why they gave former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton an advance look at their findings. Retired Adm. Mike Mullen, vice chairman of the accountability review board, also acknowledged that he had warned Mrs. Clinton’s chief of staff not to send a particular official to Congress because he thought “she would be a weak witness” who might have hurt the State Department’s stance.
Two witnesses who testified to the probe committee have been prohibited from testifying to Congress by the Obama Administration.
Why was the probe limited in scope? Why was Clinton allowed to read the report before it was delivered to Congress? Why is testimony of eye-witnesses being refused? When are they going to get the skunk our of the woodpile?
No comments:
Post a Comment